Here’s what our cloud hosts had to say about this week’s episode: 363: SQS: 20 Years of waiting in line
Justin Brodley
Every week there’s a new “AI is about to kill X” headline. This week it was Thomas Dohmke — GitHub’s former CEO — launching Entire, a distributed Git network built for the AI-agent era. It lets developers mirror their GitHub repos to regional servers so AI coding agents can pull code without hammering one central repo. But here’s the nuance the headlines skip: GitHub stays the system of record. This isn’t a GitHub killer, it’s infrastructure solving a real scaling problem AI agents are creating.
Same week, Business Insider covered Scape — a YC-backed startup layering AI on top of your existing Gmail or Outlook to handle drafting and triage. Not a Gmail killer either — it’s built to work with Gmail, not against it.
What both stories miss is that momentum is hard to overcome without real pressure. HEY.com is my go-to example. Basecamp built a genuinely better email product — mobile-first, thoughtfully designed — and it still hasn’t dented Gmail. Two reasons: Gmail is fine, not great, not amazing, just fine. And Gmail is free; HEY costs money.
I want AI to force incumbents to rethink legacy products. But whether the pressure that finally does it comes from scrappy new entrants or from Gmail/GitHub just bolting on AI features themselves — jury’s still out.
Matthew Kohn
I remember when I first heard about AWS S3/SQS, back when I was doing IT work. My reaction was skepticism: why would anyone trust having their data outside their own control?
Fast forward twenty years, and the landscape has completely flipped. Almost no one keeps data in their office anymore, everything lives in OneDrive, Google Drive, and countless other cloud services.
It’s remarkable how much the world has changed in just two decades, and how much of that change has been driven by technology.
Leave a Reply